Created on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 18:56
Written by AFP
graffiti depicting former President Hosni Mubarak and several presidential candidates at Tahrir square in Cairo May 22 2012 Reuters
The large number of voters undecided between candidates touting radically different futures for Egypt and the novelty of a free presidential vote make this week’s election almost impossible to call, pollsters say.
The candidates, from Islamists to former members of ousted president Hosni Mubarak’s regime, have seen their fortunes swing wildly in almost weekly polls conducted by a government-funded think-tank and an independent survey center.
But even support for the leading candidate in a May 16 poll, former premier Ahmed Shafiq, is dwarfed by the large number of undecided voters who may tip the election’s result in another candidate’s favor, said a prominent pollster.
“The candidate with the most support was still below the undecided,” said Maged Osman, who heads Baseera, an independent survey center.
Most polls conducted by Baseera, the government-funded al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies, and the government’s research arm show four frontrunners.
Two of them are likely to go into June run-offs after the May 23 and 24 vote, the first presidential election since an uprising toppled Mubarak in February 2011.
Former foreign minister and Arab League chief Amr Mussa has consistently ranked first in weekly surveys conducted in countrywide face-to-face interviews by the al-Ahram Centre think-tank.
But he dipped nine points, to 31 percent, in a May 20 poll, followed closely in a May 20 poll by Ahmed Shafiq, a tough talking former air force general who was Mubarak’s last premier.
The powerful Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate Mohammed Mursi came third, his best showing yet, with independent Islamist Abdel Moneim Abul Fotouh in fourth place.
In Baseera’s last poll on May 16, carried out with a sample of 2,200 people from across Egypt over mobile phones and land lines, Shafiq led with 19.3 percent, followed by Mussa with 14.6 percent and Abul Fotouh with 12.4 percent.
But 33 percent of those surveyed said they were undecided.
A poll by the government’s Information and Decision Support Centre on May 19 also showed Shafiq leading with 12 percent, with Mussa in second place with 11 percent.
The fluctuating polls and contradictions between the surveys have prompted accusations, particularly from some candidates, of pollster bias and incompetence. Mursi’s campaign compared them with “astrologers”.
But pollsters say the changes in the results reflect the novelty of a free election in the historically authoritarian country and its fragmented politics after the uprising.
“Within each trend, there is intense competition between the candidates. The political trends could not decide on a candidate,” said the Ahram Centre’s head of polling, Ahmed Nagui Kamha.
“This is the first time Egyptians elect a president. You used to choose between Mubarak and Mubarak,” said Osman, who once headed the government’s survey center under the president and then served as a minister after his fall.
“Before, there wasn’t much distinction between rhetoric. Now it’s very different,” he said of the candidates’ platforms.
Other factors have also played into the candidates’ rankings, Osman said.
He said that Shafiq, who was forced to resign a month after Mubarak’s ouster by massive street rallies, won sympathy, particularly among female voters, after his wife died last month.
Shafiq, who campaigns on a severe law-and-order platform that appeals to voters disillusioned with a spike in violence over the past 15 months, also benefited from a deadly May 4 protest outside the defense ministry, he added.
But the final say will belong to the undecided and perhaps the candidate who is most efficient at bringing out the vote, pollsters said.
“They will change the results completely,” said Sahar Ammar, head of polling at the government’s Information and Decision Support Centre.
That may yet help Mursi, who although behind other candidates, enjoys the support of the Muslim Brotherhood’s countrywide network of activists that helped the Islamists sweep the polls in parliament and senate this year.
“There is the element of the last-minute decision, and that can be affected by the Muslim Brotherhood’s machinery for mustering voters,” said Osman.