Created on Monday, 20 February 2012 06:49
Written by Staff Editor
Also according to the Pact of Omar, dhimmis “shall not prevent” any of their family members from converting to Islam. Raymond Ibrahim - Frontpage Mag.
The following article was first published by the Stonegate Institute.
For Egypt’s Christian Copts, the New Year began with threats that their churches would be attacked during Christmas mass (celebrated on January 7). Because many were eyeing the situation—several Coptic churches were previously attacked
, including last Christmas (eight dead) and New Year’s day (23 dead), not to mention ominous harbingers around the world, such as the Nigerian Christmas day church bombings
(40 dead) —the Muslim Brotherhood proclaimed it would “protect
” the Copts during their church services. Happily, Coptic Christmas came and went without incident.
Yet, if the Muslim Brotherhood “protected” Coptic churches when many around the world were watching, as soon as attention dissipated, it was business as usual: a large number of Salafis and Muslim Brotherhood
members entered a church, asserting that it had no license and no one should pray in it, with hints that it might be turned into a mosque—an all too typical approach in Muslim countries where building or even renovating churches is next to impossible.
More to the point, 2012 appears to be unfolding as the “year of dhimmitude” for Egypt’s Christians. Consider the following anecdotes starting from just last January, all of which demonstrate an upsurge in the treatment of Egypt’s Copts as dhimmis (dhimmi being the legal term for Islam’s “protected” non-Muslim minorities—“protected,” that is, as long as they agree to a number of debilitations that renders them second-class citizens):
According to the Pact of Omar
(which is also one of the earliest sources banning the construction or renovation of churches), dhimmis must “respect Muslims” and never insult them or their religion. Accordingly, a prominent Christian, Naguib Sawiris
, is charged with “contempt of religion” for twittering a cartoon of a bearded Mickey Mouse and veiled Minnie: “The case has added to fears among many that ultraconservative Islamists may use their new found powers to try to stifle freedom of expression.” Nor are the double standards in Egypt’s “contempt of religion” law missed: Christianity is daily disparaged in Egypt with impunity.
Likewise, a 17-year-old Christian student accused of posting a drawing of Islam’s prophet
on Facebook—which he denies, saying it was posted without his permission—triggered days of Muslim violence and havoc, including the burning of three Christian homes to cries of “Allahu Akbar
.” The student, who was beaten, is to be “held
” for fifteen days, “pending investigation.” Muslim leaders agree “that priests should publicly apologize for the images, and that the student as well as his family should move out of the governorate.”
Also according to the Pact of Omar, dhimmis “shall not prevent” any of their family members from converting to Islam. Accordingly, some 20,000 Muslims just attacked a Coptic church
, demanding the death of its pastor, who, along with “nearly 100 terrorized Copts sought refuge inside the church, while Muslim rioters were pelting the church with stones in an effort to break into the church, assault the Copts and torch the building.” They did this because a Christian girl who, according to Islamic law, automatically became a Muslim when her father converted to Islam, fled her father and was rumored to be hiding in the church. This would not be the first time
in recent months that churches are attacked onsimilar rumors
Traditionally, if one dhimmi transgressed, all surrounding dhimmis werecollectively punished
As the jurist al-Murtada writes: “The agreement will be canceled if all or some of them [dhimmis] break it”; another jurist, al-Maghili taught that “the fact that one individual (or one group) among them has broken the statute is enough to invalidate it for all of them.”
Accordingly, a mob of over 3,000 Muslims attacked Christians
in an Alexandrian village because a Muslim barber accused a Christian of having “intimate photos” of a Muslim woman on his phone (Sharia bans non-Muslim men from marrying Muslim women). Terrified, the Christian, who denies having such photos, turned himself in to the police. Regardless, Coptic homes and shops were looted and set ablaze. Three Christians were injured, while “terrorized” women and children, rendered homeless, stood in the streets with no place to go. As usual, it took the army an hour to drive 2 kilometers to the village: “This happens every time. They wait outside the village until the Muslims have had enough violence, then they appear.” None of the perpetrators were arrested.
Since the initial attacks, and in an effort to empty the village of its 62 Christian families, Muslims attacked them again
, burning more Coptic property. According to police, the woman concerned has denied the whole story, and no photos were found.
Koran 9:29 commands Muslims to “Fight … the People of the Book [Jews and Christians] until they pay the jizya [monetary tribute] with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” Although abolished under Western pressure during the colonial era, Muslim demands for jizya are back
. And though it has currently not been reinstated, some Muslims have taken matters in their own hands by extorting money from Christians
in lieu of jizya. (Who can forget the Egyptian preacher Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini’s
lament that Muslims could alleviate their economic woes if only they returned to the good old days of Islam, when plundering, abducting, and selling/ransoming infidels were a great way of making a living?) Thus, Two Christians were killed
“after a Muslim racketeer opened fire on them for refusing to pay him extortion money.” The local bishop said, “I hold security forces and local Muslims fully responsible for terrorizing the Copts living there, who are continuously being subjected to terror and kidnapping.”
Then there is the Islamic principle that necessity makes that which is forbidden permissible
. In this context, the rights of dhimmis can be trampled upon so long as an Islamic interest is served. Accordingly,
in a region that is half Christian,Muslim mobs went on a rampage, attacking Copts
, destroying and torching their homes and property to more screams of “Allahu Akbar.” Why? Simply to prevent Copts from voting and to ensure that a Salafist (Islamist) candidate win. “No Copt from Rahmaniya-Kebly was able to vote today, so the Salafists will win the elections,” descried a witness. Equally telling is that, while the population of this region is half Christian, there are 300 mosques and only one church.
Finally, perhaps nothing better demonstrates the return of dhimmitude for Copts as when the Egyptian government itself—as opposed to “radicals” or “mobs”—openly treats Christians as second-class citizens. Aside from the aforementioned “contempt of religion” cases, other anecdotes surfacing in January include a legal case revolving around the abduction of a 16-year-old Christian girl
. The court sided with Islamist lawyers, in a decision that Coptic activists are saying will “encourage Islamists to continue unabated the abduction of Christian minors for conversion to Islam.” Similarly, rather than punishing the aggressors, the government has arrested and is trying two priests
in connection with the Maspero massacre
, when the military opened fire on and ran tanks over Copts protesting the constant destruction of their churches. Finally is the fact that, although Egypt’s new parliament
has 409 seats, only 7 are Copts, though Copts make up at the very least 10% of the population, and so should have approximately 40 seats.
Raymond Ibrahim: a Shillman Fellow at the DHFC, is a widely published author on Islam, and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum. Join him as he explores the "Intersection"—the pivotal but ignored point where Islam and Christianity meet—including by examining the latest on Christian persecution, translating important Arabic news that never reaches the West, and much more.